On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Didn't PostgreSQL used to have more than 1 storage engine in the past? > I thought I read somewhere it did, but it was decided it was a > compromise on stability and/or quality, so ended up using a single > kick-ass engine? Yes, many, many moons ago. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
