On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 22:18 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > I have no problem with him trying to protect his hard earned work. I > > just think he is trying to solve the wrong problem. > > It's a real problem faced by many businesses and solved by most > commercial DBMSs. Of course, it's basically impossible to solve in the > Open Source world, as there's nowhere to hide a key or obfuscation > algorithm. If akp geek is able to use EnterpriseDB builds of Postgres, > then he may want to look at PL/Secure, which will obfuscate his > pl/pgsql code: > > http://www.enterprisedb.com/products/pl_secure_standard_server.do That's interesting... does it just turn it into bytecode? Joshua D. Drake > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
