On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Chris Browne <cbbrowne@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd like that feature, and I don't think it takes too much arguing to > get to the point that a declarative "IMMUTABLE" control is rather less > Not only that, but if you were to, say, make the PK field IMMUTABLE you could then optimize out the locks involved when updating rows with FK relations to the PK (or any other FK field, I suppose) -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
