Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Advice on contingency plan for DAS array with separate local WAL drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/14/10 8:05 AM, "Jeff Amiel" <becauseimjeff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> What is recommended in terms of prep/switchover in this instance?  Should we
> be rsyncing or using built-in wal-log shipping of these transaction logs to
> our stand-by server?  Simply pop out these drives and hand-move them to the
> standby-server? (assuming they are not the issue in the first place)


I should note that this 'similar' server is not intended to actually be a
real warm standby server in the postgres sense...it serves other
purposes...it simply possesses the right configuration (memory, cpu) to act
as a temporary database server.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux