On 6/8/10 1:15 PM, "Jaime Casanova" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Jeff Amiel <jamiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> ....Does Slony manage it's own vacuuming separate from postgres' autovacuum? >> > > Yes it does: http://www.slony.info/documentation/maintenance.html " It seems preferable to configure autovacuum to avoid vacuum Slony-I-managed configuration tables. " Hmmm....I don't do this. Surely this is not relative to my corrupt indexes....2 attempted vacuums on same indexes? -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
