David Fetter wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:29:50PM -0700, Richard Broersma wrote: > > This might be a premature question considering write-able CTEs are not > > in core, but... > > > > I wondering if write-able CTE's will be the silver bullet that will > > make rule based update-able views based multiple vertically > > partitioned table robust. By robust, I mean to elimination the > > update anomalies that can occur from the view point client side > > optimistic locking where the virtual row appears to be > > inconsistently updated. > > I'm not sure I understand. When the concurrency issues in writeable > CTEs get fixed, they could become a mechanism for doing what you > describe, but I suspect there would be significant work involved in > harnessing them to that task. > > They'll be pretty nice even without the automated view stuff, though :) If the user wants to submit it, fine, but neither Tom nor I are excited about it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
