Hello.
>Is effective_io_concurrency working on WinXP sp2 ?
No.
"effective_io_concurrency" works when an OS can use posix_fadvise().
But I think WinXP doesn't have posix_fadvise().
>and what is the difference between effective_io_concurrency = 0
>and effective_io_concurrency = 1
If effective_io_concurrency = 0,PostgreSQL never uses PREFETCH.
On my environment, my PostgreSQL doesn't start up when
effective_io_concurrency=1.
#My environment WinXP sp2 and PostgreSQL is 8.4.4, too.
What I referenced)
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-03/msg00911.php
http://doxygen.postgresql.org/bufmgr_8c-source.html#l00075
pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c
00070 /*
00071 * How many buffers PrefetchBuffer callers should try to stay
ahead of their
00072 * ReadBuffer calls by. This is maintained by the assign hook for
00073 * effective_io_concurrency. Zero means "never prefetch".
00074 */
Hello.
I have 2 questions:
Is effective_io_concurrency working on WinXP sp2 ?
and what is the difference between effective_io_concurrency = 0
and effective_io_concurrency = 1
Postgres 8.4.4
------------
pasman
--
================================================
Kenichiro Tanaka
K.K.Ashisuto
http://www.ashisuto.co.jp/english/index.html
================================================
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
