On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, the inability to change the list of values is certainly an > unpleasant limitation, but is it so fatal that we should hide the > feature from people who could possibly use it? I think not. I happened upon this article relevant to the subject after googling a bit: http://www.justatheory.com/computers/databases/postgresql/enforce-set-of-values.html One of the comments suggests adding an entry to pg_enum to expand the legal values of an existing ENUM type. How safe is this idea? Josh -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
