On Tuesday 4. May 2010 18.05.02 Tom Lane wrote: > Leif Biberg Kristensen <leif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Another point: I'm uncertain how to define a «user» in this context. Someone > > who wants to highlight plpgsql code snippets is most likely to be some kind of > > developer. > > Sure, but what I meant was "not intended to be called directly from > SQL". Lots of those functions underlie operators, for example, and > you're really expected to use the operator instead. Stuff like > btree support functions likewise not really intended to be called > manually. Yes, I think we are agreed. See also my earlier reply to Yeb Havinga, where I expressed some second thoughts about including a full function list. I think that the «public» functions included in the docs are sufficient for most purposes. There aren't an awful lot of them; I compiled a list by hand in a couple of hours. regards, -- Leif Biberg Kristensen http://solumslekt.org/blog/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
