Search Postgresql Archives

Am I supposed to be all scared of compound primary keys?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have a table that stores a user ID and a subscription type, and this is really all it needs to store and any pair of values will always be unique.  In fact, I think this pair should be the primary key on the table.  However, I'm using Castle ActiveRecord which says at:

http://www.castleproject.org/activerecord/documentation/v1rc1/usersguide/pks.html#CompositePK

And I quote:

Quick Note: Composite keys are highly discouraged. Use only when you have no other alternative.

I get the feeling they're discouraged from a SQL point of view, but it doesn't actually say why anywhere.  Is there any good reason to avoid using composite keys on a table?  Why waste the space of an extra key if you don't have to?  Thanks!

Mike


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux