On 23/04/2010 1:42 AM, Said Ramirez wrote:
Primary keys are defined as 'unique not null' even if they are
composite. So I believe postgres would not let you do that
You can, however, add a UNIQUE constraint on the column set as a whole.
PostgreSQL does *not* enforce non-null in this case, so some or all of
any fields not constrained NOT NULL are permitted to be NULL.
*however*, it might not do what you want. Because "NULL = NULL" has the
result "NULL", not "true", the following is quite legal:
create table test (
a text not null,
b text,
unique(a,b)
);
insert into test (a,b) values ('fred',NULL);
insert into test (a,b) values ('fred',NULL);
... and will succeed:
db=> select * from test;
a | b
------+-----
fred |
fred |
If you wish to prohibit this, then you can't really use nullable fields
in the unique constraint. You'll have to do something ugly like define
an explicit 'none/undefined' placeholder value, or re-think how you're
storing things.
It's for this reason that I think it's a really good thing that PRIMARY
KEY requires all fields in the key to be NOT NULL. SQL NULLs just don't
make sense in a primary key because they don't test equal to another null.
--
Craig Ringer
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
