Bill Moran escribió: > One thing that a lot of people seem to get confused about is that they > subconsciously think that ints or bigints take up less space when the > numbers are small. I.e.: I want to use an int for my state identifier > instead of the 2-digit code, because it will use less space -- wrong, > an int is 4 bytes, but a 2 byte char column is 1/2 that ... even if the > number never gets higher than 50. Eh, a 2 byte char column uses 3 bytes -- there's one byte of overhead. (Unless one of the chars is multibyte in which case it can be longer). Earlier versions of Postgres use 6 bytes to store the 2 chars (4 bytes of overhead), so it would be larger than the int. Not that this invalidates the argument -- just nitpicking here. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
