Tom Lane wrote: > Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > *) csv is supposed to be CRLF *always*. We do not do this. We do > > however read different types of newlines. So we are a 4180 reader but > > not an emitter. Not so sure if I think changing this is a good idea > > though without exposing a knob. > > Given the lack of field complaints, I think changing this would be a > pretty terrible idea; much more likely to break things than fix them. > It's not like that RFC has huge recognition as The Standard. Should we document we support the standard? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
