Search Postgresql Archives

Re: pl/java status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Damian Carey wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
> > >> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
> > >>
> > >> There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community (and I don't
> > >> even like Perl).
> > >>
> > >
> > 
> > Java2perl anyone ?
> > http://search.cpan.org/~philcrow/Java-Javap-0.04/bin/java2perl6
> > (99% joking)
> > 
> > And if you think positively a 14hour TZ difference is really only 10
> > if you go the other way.
> 
> Is PL/J still being developed?  I can't find it myself, but was curious.

Not as far as I know.

> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx>        http://momjian.us
>   EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
> 


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux