Search Postgresql Archives

Re: simultaneously reducing both memory usage and runtime for a query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Tom Lane wrote:

Faheem Mitha <faheem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
... In any case, feedback would be helpful. Details of my attempts
at optimization are at
http://bulldog.duhs.duke.edu/~faheem/snppy/opt.pdf

By and large, this is not the way to ask for help on the Postgres lists.
If you're supplying extremely large test data or something, it's fair to
provide a link instead of putting the information in-line, but otherwise
you should try to make your email self-contained.  Those of us who are
willing to help are not here just to help you --- we'd like other people
to learn from it too, both at the time and later from the archived
discussion.  So the information needs to be in the email thread, not
only on some transient web page.

I submitted a modified self-contained email as requested, but it does not appear to have made it to the list, and I never got any kind of reject message. It was around 1000 lines with no attachments. Is there a size limit for posts, and if so, what is it? If it was rejected due to some filter, it would be desirable (and polite) if the recepient was told what happened.

                                                          Regards, Faheem.

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux