On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Ben Chobot <bench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:15 AM, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> syslog doesn't give you easily machine readable output. I'm not sure how syslog implementations handle high load (our sysadmins won't use it, so I haven't investigated this further).
Have you looked into syslog-ng? I believe it does just this sort of thing for you.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
We use syslog-ng for sorting our syslogs into different log files. It works well enough.
What annoys me is that postgresql will split a SQL statement across several syslog "events". I know that syslog itself has a maximum message size and that this is required for really long SQL. However, I wanted to log each SQL statement as a single "event". Syslog-ng can direct output to a pipe. Putting these together I had begun working on a system where out syslog host (which logs this from lots of other, unrelated systems) would sort the postgresql logs to STDIN on a perl program that would reassemble the individual SQL statements and write them out in a different format. I never completed the project (just got busy with more important things). However, I thought that this approach was feasible.
That being said, I would love it if Postgresql had logging mechanism plugin. Maybe it could load a so/dll that would handle logging. That so/dll would export a function like this:
void pg_log_init (/* some params related to the database instance */);
void pg_log_done (void); // called on database shutdown.
void pg_log_sql (int runtime, int rows, int status, const char *sql, const char *user);
"status" would be some code to indicate if the sql was successful or not.
The above is just off the top of my head. I've done no real research on if the above would be sufficient or correct.
Just an idea...
