Thom Brown escribió: > On 26 February 2010 14:33, Raymond O'Donnell <rod@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 26/02/2010 12:15, Thom Brown wrote: > >> On 26 February 2010 12:02, Anton Maksimenkov <anton200@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm also curious to know why there's an underflow error instead of > overflow. And in fact, even if a 19 digit phone number were passed > in, it would only result in a 10^-1 calculation, resulting in 0.1. > > I think we need to know what value is being passed in to generate this error. If you pass a string longer than 342 chars it fails with an underflow. Not sure why it doesn't fail the second time, sounds fishy. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
