Search Postgresql Archives

Re: tuning bgwriter in 8.4.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:47 PM, Greg Smith wrote:

> Ben Chobot wrote:
>> Is it reading it correctly to say that the bgwriter probably wouldn't help much, because a majority of the dirty pages appear to be popular?
> 
> Yes.  The background writer cleaner process only does something useful if there are pages with low usage counts it can evict.  You would need to increase shared_buffers significantly before it's likely that would happen.  Right now, 87% of your buffer cache has a usage count of 2 or higher, which basically means it's filled with almost nothing but the working set of data it never wants to evict unless it's for a checkpoint.

Hm, my shared_buffers is already 10GB, but I'm using about 80GB for filesystem cache. Would a larger shared_buffers make sense? I thought I read somewhere that 10GB is on the high end of the useful size for shared_buffers.
-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux