Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I have updated the documentation to be more direct about COPY encoding > > behavior. Patch attached and applied. > > Uh, why exactly do you find that better? "Processes data" seems a lot > vaguer to me than the previous wording. I certainly don't think that > this does much to address Peter's original complaint. I thought the problem was that we said "input", then "output" and then got to the point about the server, and I thought the reader just stopped reading that far, so I tried to shorten it so the idea was sooner, and I mentioned "server" at the end. It might not be better, but I tried. We don't want to highlight the input/output, we want to highlight that all input and output are controlled by the client encoding. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@xxxxxxxxxx> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
