Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> the speed depends on setting of working_memory. Try to increase a working_memory

> It's already at
>  20000kB

According to your original posting, you're trying to sort something like
a gigabyte of data.  20MB is peanuts.  I wouldn't recommend increasing
the value across-the-board, but setting it to several hundred meg for
this particular query might help.  How much RAM in your machine anyway?

Also, the fact that mysql is faster suggests that having an index does help.
Possibly the data is nearly ordered by transactionid, in which case an
indexscan would not have random-access problems and would be much faster
than an explicit sort.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux