-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 >> No, but I imagine we still would encourage people to run the latest revision >> of it. Come this time next year, I hope that we'll tell people on 7.4.2 to > > Do we really, officially, care? Well, yes, we certainly should. Just because a branch is no longer officially supported doesn't mean we want to discourage people from running the latest available revision. >> upgrade to 9.0 as soon as possible, but to upgrade to 7.4.27 *immaediately*. > > We should be, and afaik are, telling people to upgrade away from 7.4 > immidiately *already*. Well, sure, but there's a world of difference from upgrading from 7.4.2 to 7.4.27 and from upgrading from 7.4.2 to 8.4.2. > The *meaning* has always been supported versions, but if you read the > contents of the feed it does say latest. Well, I'd prefer to have the old versions, but I can handle the status quo. As long nobody pulls versions before they are really dead again. :) - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201002111128 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkt0MCUACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjKlQCgr1H+rp14YYhnByAOz2CaGqCp +IAAoN00KX9OVwnxAOZIJpAyGgx6qCv1 =1D4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
