On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 13:09 +0000, Thom Brown wrote: > > Could someone clarify, is this guy indeed correct and the licence page > needs updating stating it's something similar to an MIT licence, or is > he just plain wrong? As it stands, the Wikipedia page on PostgreSQL > says "similar to the MIT License". http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1256509037.7432.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
