Hi, I am prototyping a system which sends all INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE events to a third party software, I do: CREATE TABLE data (id Serial PRIMARY KEY, data VARCHAR(255)); CREATE TABLE log (op CHAR(6), id integer, data VARCHAR(255)); CREATE OR REPLACE RULE send_notify AS ON INSERT TO log DO ALSO NOTIFY logevent; CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION log_event() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$ BEGIN IF (TG_OP = 'DELETE') THEN INSERT INTO log VALUES ('DELETE', OLD.id, OLD.data); ELSIF (TG_OP = 'UPDATE') THEN INSERT INTO log VALUES ('UPDATE', NEW.id, NEW.data); ELSIF (TG_OP = 'INSERT') THEN INSERT INTO log VALUES ('INSERT', NEW.id, NEW.data); END IF; RETURN NULL; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; CREATE TRIGGER log_event_trigger AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON data FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE log_event(); A simple client program is used to wait for the NOTIFY logevent and query the log table to send the changes, then delete what he has sent. When I inserted data to TABLE data with the rate of about 25 every second, the client can receive the notifies without any problem, and when I use 3 similar programs to feed data, which means about 75 events every second, I found that Postgres didn't send NOTIFY opportunely, since the client do SELECT query every several hundreds seconds, which is too long to be acceptable. So what I want to know is, is there anything wrong with my idea? and how frequence can LISTEN/NOTIFY support? Thanks. Regards, Gavin Mu -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general