(adding pgsql-www, isn't this more a www question than a general postgresql usage question?) 2010/1/29 Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > While looking into a failed check_postgres check, I found a problem > with the canonical versions page here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/versions.rss > > It only goes back to 8.0, but as far as I know, 7.4 is not unsupported Hmm. Seems 7.4 was removed by Dave when we released 8.4: https://pgweb.postgresql.org/changeset/2520 Dave, do you recall why? > yet, so that page should be listing 7.4.27. Further, shouldn't we be keeping > even 'unsupported' versions on this page, so (e.g. case of check_postgres.pl) > clients can check if they have the latest revision, even if the major/minor > combo is super old? No, I don't think we should. We should list supported versions only. And check_postgres could be advised to throw a warning at least if you're running an unsupported version ;) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
