2010/1/27 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> But why still on separate schema? >> I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." anymore. >> Just like (most of) all other contrib mudules ... > > If this were to get committed, it would definitely get made to look just > like all the other contrib modules; so forget the separate schema. > I have not problem with it. Code to contrib module can be more modificated. Current code is for pgfoundry and I prefer some separation. regards Pavel > But what I'm wondering is whether it should be contrib or in core. > Is there some potential reason why someone might not want it installed? > > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
