Scenario: You have to update a record. One or more fields are unchanged from the original record being altered. So you have two options: 1) Include those fields in your UPDATE statement, even though they are unchanged; 2) Omit unchanged fields from the UPDATE statement. My first inclination is to omit unchanged fields. However, I have the idea that PG simply marks the existing record to be dropped, and generates a whole new row by copying unspecified fields from the original record. My question is, which is more efficient? Performance-wise, does it matter whether unchanged fields are included or omitted on UPDATE statements? Paul -- Paul M. Foster -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
