Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Slow Query / Check Point Segments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg Smith wrote:
My guess is that there's something wrong with your config such that writes followed by fsync are taking longer than they should. When I see "sync=0.640 s" into a SAN where that sync operation should be near instant, I'd be looking for issues in the ZFS intent log setup, how much data you've setup ZFS to write cache, and the write cache policy on the SAN hardware. There's something weird going on here, that sync should be near instant on your hardware with such a small write volume.

Unfortunately, you may have to take the server down to find out exactly what's going on, which doesn't sound practical for your environment. (And people wonder why I have near religious zeal about testing disk hardware before systems go into production)


there's a further complication. this system is deep in southeast asia on a rather slow and saturated network connection such that trying to figure out stuff about it is challenging at best. I know the database has a lot of write volume overall, and its only one of several databases running in different zones on the server. I know nothing about the SAN, I suspect its a EMC Symmetrix of some sort. Probably a generation or two behind latest. The operations people are used to running large oracle databases.





--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux