There are two ways of deleting things, DELETE FROM <table> WHERE PK IN ( ...SET... ); DELETE FROM <table> USING <table2> WHERE <join condition> AND <filter clause>; I am deleting from a table where the rows are inter-related (it is a tree); using the first version with IN, it does not delete all rows; there is a trigger that rearranges the rows when a row is deleted (updating references etc.). Disabling this trigger results in correct behavoir. However, using the second version (using USING) works as expected with or without disabling the said triggers. I cannot quite understand this; Are the contents of the IN query worked out ONCE per outer query and therefore become invalid when DELETE comes along and changes items that were part of the set ? (for e.g.) -ravi -- :wq -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
