Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Large tables, ORDER BY and sequence/index scans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "AL" == Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    AL> Did you try to reduce the cursor_tuple_fraction parameter?

No, good idea, thanks.  It helps.

The question is whether it's a good idea to reduce cursor_tuple_fraction
universally, without knowing the table size before (and I'm not going to
use SELECT COUNT(*) for well known reasons).  But I can probably
experiment a bit and will see, it looks promising.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux