On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:46:54AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Sam Mason <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > As others have said; BYTEA is probably the best datatype for you to > > use. The encoding of BYTEA literals is a bit of a fiddle and may need > > some changes, but it's going to be much more faithful to your needs of > > treating the filename as an opaque blob of data. > > bytea might be theoretically the best choice, but the fact remains that > 99% of the entries will be text that's readable in the user's encoding > (whatever that is). I agree it'll be fine most of the time and the more important thing is normally the data rather than the filename. Still, for non-english speaking people I'd guess there are many more encodings floating around than I'd ever expect to see on a daily basis. Us English/US speakers really do have a very easy life. There's also the issue that the user's encoding doesn't necessarily match the system's encoding. Thus within an account everything may be easy, but when a system daemon comes in and looks at things it's going to be somewhat messy. No hard numbers either way, I just know I see a very biased sample of systems and would not like to make generalizations. > What concerns me is the claim that PG made a database with some > arbitrary parameters after having rejected a now-considered-invalid > command. I frankly do not believe that, but if it did happen it's > a *serious* bug that requires investigation. Yup, be interesting to hear more details from the OP about this. -- Sam http://samason.me.uk/ -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
