-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greg Smith: > Flexibility is often expensive from a performance point of view. We > regularly tell people here that they have to avoid using Linux's LVM for > similar reasons--while it shouldn't be so slow, it is. Nothing you can > do about it but use direct disk partitions instead if you need the > performance to be good. Okay, that makes sense. What about using plain slices for the WAL, but using the VM for the data? For example, we have 14 disks, so I could allocate 2 for the log in RAID1 (146GB, which is more than enough), then use the remaining 12 under VxVM for the data. If I understand right, the critical factor is the WAL write speed; the VM is easily able to keep up with writes to the data files, since those are mostly asynchronous. Does this seems like a reasonable solution? (I'll benchmark this configuration anyway, but I'd be interested in any comments.) Thanks, River. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (HP-UX) iEYEARECAAYFAksWwi0ACgkQIXd7fCuc5vKxzQCeMB0ECbxedXIcQ+YEhFcuUJzc 7egAn0zbzed5VL/E8UPFReZDhl50LTuK =NvX6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
