On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Howard Cole wrote: > Does anyone know of a replication solution that can handle large objects? Preferrably on a per database rather than per cluster basis. Take a look at Mammoth Replicator: https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/replicator. Additionally there is a list of available open-source replication solutions here: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication%2C_Clustering%2C_and_Connection_Pooling Personally I'm not aware of other solutions supporting large objects, but I'm sure there should be more of them :). > > Incidentally - out of interest - why doesn't Slony handle large objects? > Here is an excerpt from the Slony documentation: Slony-I does not automatically propagate schema changes, nor does it have any ability to replicate large objects. There is a single common reason for these limitations, namely that Slony-I collects updates using triggers, and neither schema changes, large object operations, nor TRUNCATE requests are able to have triggers suitable to inform Slony-I when those sorts of changes take place. As a result, the only database objects where Slony-I can replicate updates are tables and sequences. http://www.slony.info/documentation/slonyintro.html#INTRODUCTION I'm not sure that it's up-to-date, since 8.4 has at least on truncate triggers, but still there are no triggers on large objects yet. -- Alexey Klyukin http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
