On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Access is pretty random actually, and fill factor on this database is >> 100% because it doesn't really get updated, just appended to. There >> are a lot of parallel insertions going on if that helps. > > Do you mean you actually have fillfactor set somewhere? It didn't show > on the \d output. No, I just assumed it was 100% still by default. Did that change? > Is this a 32-bit or 64-bit machine? 64 bit. Centos / RHEL 5.3 running the -95 or so Centos 5.2 kernel because later kernels cause problems with the Areca 1680 series RAID array controller kicking offline at odd times -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
