Re: Allowing for longer table names (>64 characters)

[Tino Wildenhain <tino@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Allan,

Am 20.11.2009 10:42, schrieb Allan Kamau:
...
> Thanks Andreas, I too agree it may not be a good idea to have long for
> various reasons including porting/upgrading issues and so on, as I
> have many tables, I seem to have been caught up in describing table
> functionality in the table name :-)

As Andreas said, comment is perhaps a better place for descriptions.

Also did you thought of using schema as additional grouping system to
avoid having many overly descriptive table names?

Regards
Tino

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>