On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:33:05AM -0700, Konstantin Izmailov wrote: > Some companies have policy to stay DB agnostic, i.e. use standard > SQL only. That's called shooting yourself in the head. Unless you have a very, very specific, business-critical reason to pay this huge cost, you should never attempt it. That some companies have silly, self-destructive policies is not a reason for anybody not working there to pay attention to same. More details on why it's so inevitably expensive below: http://people.planetpostgresql.org/dfetter/index.php?/archives/32-Portability-Part-I.html http://people.planetpostgresql.org/dfetter/index.php?/archives/33-Portability-Part-II.html Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@xxxxxxxxxx> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@xxxxxxxxx iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general