Tom Lane wrote: > Richard Huxton <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Gunnar Sønsteby wrote: >>> 2009-11-12 06:11:51 CET INSERTERROR: cache lookup failed for type 19218 > >> So - something is trying to access a slony type via its old OID rather >> than its new one (or something like that). Not sure what this would be, >> since the drop-schema + cascade should have removed anything that could >> do this. > >> It's probably impossible to identify precisely what it was since it's >> not there any more. > > Well, there's still a reference to it somewhere in the system catalogs, > and locating the reference would give you a pretty good clue what it > was --- not to mention being a prerequisite step for cleaning up. > I'd try searching pg_class.reltype and pg_proc.prorettype for starters. > If no luck there, go through all the columns that are cited as linking > to pg_type.oid in > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/catalogs.html I was thinking it was a reference inside a function or similar. I'm guessing "compiled" plpgsql is opaque? -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
