I have set up the replication using Bucardo. This is just an additional set up
regards
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, silly8888 <silly8888@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How about using replication instead of incremental backups?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009, akp geek <akpgeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So Is it always good to have the backup using PG_dump instead of PITR or
>> a combination of both
>>
>
> I like to do both. Ongoing PITR, daily base backups (by updating an rsync
> copy), and weekly pg_dumps that in turn go to tape.
>
> PITR gives a very recent restore point in the event of server loss. As
> previously mentioned, the full (custom) backups let you restore individual
> tables. They're also a lot smaller than base backups + WAL logs.
>
> --
> "No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. We tried but that
> damn monkey was just too fast."
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
