On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:39 +0000, Thom Brown wrote: > Is there a reason we require fixed-size WAL files? Currently we reuse the files, which is much easier with fixed size files. It might have been interesting once to pass the size at log switch through to the archiver as a parameter, though we didn't do that at the time. Streaming is the way forwards, not file-by-file. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
