Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > A question, though: why are there symbolic names for certain > array types (FLOAT4ARRAYOID, etc) but not for the most? It's just historical ... we've only bothered to add #defines for the array types that are explicitly referenced somewhere in the core code. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
