Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Timothy Madden escribió:

> Anyway Posgres offers a CREATE FUNCTION statement that resembles or should
> resemble that in the standard, and that is what I am talking about.

"Should" being the operative word in that sentence.  If you want to
submit a patch to move us closer towards the SQL/PSM goal, I'm sure it
will be welcome.

> I just want the Postgres version of the statement to look more like
> the standard one.

Sure.  If we weren't all pointing in that general direction, we would
probably have CONNECT BY instead of WITH RECURSIVE.

> Would you detail the differences you talk about that you see here ?

I'm not that familiar with SQL/PSM, sorry.  Pavel Stehule is da man.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux