I think we already fixed that in 7.4.2. We also have a few bugs still
in 7.4.2 and we need to get those fixed soon and release 7.4.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Hirt wrote:
> I'm following up on my own email and cross posting to hackers, because
> there is a bug that needs fixed. I spent some more time digging into
> this, and I found the cause of the problem.
>
> reltuples in pg_class is defined as a real, reltuples in pg_autovacuum
> is defined as an int. the query used to get reltuples returns
> scientific notation for my larg tables, '4.06927e+06' for the one i
> mention below. pg_autovacuum happily converts that to a '4' by doing
> atoi('4.06927e+06'), which is why it's all fubar for my large tables
> with over a million tuples.
>
> my real quick hack of changing the define in pg_autovacuum.h to cast
> reltuples to ::int4 makes it work
>
> line: 37
> #define TABLE_STATS_QUERY "select
> a.oid,a.relname,a.relnamespace,a.relpages,a.relisshared,a.reltuples::
> int4,b.schemaname,b.n_tup_ins,b.n_tup_upd,b.n_tup_del from pg_class a,
> pg_stat_all_tables b where a.oid=b.relid and a
> .relkind = 'r'"
>
> #define PAGES_QUERY "select oid,reltuples::int4,relpages from pg_class
> where oid=%i"
>
> however, i think a better fix would be to change the autovacuum to use
> a double instead of an int. if it's going to stay at int, it should
> probably be increased to long and the casts changed to ::int8
>
> any suggestions on how best way to fix?
>
> i'll supply a patch once the approach is agreed upon and the problem
> has been verified.
>
>
> best regards,
>
> --brian
>
> On May 18, 2004, at 7:37 PM, Brian Hirt wrote:
>
> > I've having a strange issue with pg_autovacuum. I have a table with
> > about 4 million rows in 20,000 pages. autovacuum likes to vacuum
> > and/or analyze it every 45 minutes or so, but it probably doesn't
> > have more that a few hundred rows changed every few hours. when i
> > run autovacuum with -d3 it says
> >
> > [2004-05-18 07:04:26 PM] table name:
> > basement_nightly."public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 07:04:26 PM] relid: 396238832; relisshared: 0
> > [2004-05-18 07:04:26 PM] reltuples: 4; relpages: 20013
> > [2004-05-18 07:04:26 PM] curr_analyze_count: 0;
> > cur_delete_count: 0
> > [2004-05-18 07:04:26 PM] ins_at_last_analyze: 0;
> > del_at_last_vacuum: 0
> > [2004-05-18 07:04:26 PM] insert_threshold: 504;
> > delete_threshold 1008
> >
> > reltuples: 4 seems wrong. I would expect a table with 4m rows and 20k
> > pages to have more than 4 tuples. I think this is why the insert
> > threshhold is all messed up -- which is why it gets analyzed way too
> > frequently.
> >
> > this happens with other big tables too. the autovacuum is from
> > 7.4.2, some information is below.
> >
> >
> > output from vacuum:
> >
> > basement=# vacuum ANALYZE verbose search_words4;
> > INFO: vacuuming "public.search_words4"
> > INFO: index "search_words4_data_id" now contains 4069268 row versions
> > in 15978 pages
> > DETAIL: 479 index row versions were removed.
> > 1 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
> > CPU 0.42s/0.70u sec elapsed 29.48 sec.
> > INFO: index "search_words4_pkey" now contains 4069268 row versions in
> > 17576 pages
> > DETAIL: 479 index row versions were removed.
> > 0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
> > CPU 0.77s/0.74u sec elapsed 150.19 sec.
> > INFO: "search_words4": removed 479 row versions in 6 pages
> > DETAIL: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
> > INFO: "search_words4": found 479 removable, 4069268 nonremovable row
> > versions in 19950 pages
> > DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
> > There were 0 unused item pointers.
> > 0 pages are entirely empty.
> > CPU 1.30s/1.61u sec elapsed 179.96 sec.
> > INFO: analyzing "public.search_words4"
> > INFO: "search_words4": 19950 pages, 3000 rows sampled, 4069800
> > estimated total rows
> > VACUUM
> > basement=#
> >
> >
> >
> > here's the frequency
> > [2004-05-18 12:12:54 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 01:59:13 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 02:05:36 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 02:29:25 PM] Performing: VACUUM ANALYZE
> > "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 02:46:09 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 03:39:31 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 05:20:45 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 06:08:03 PM] Performing: VACUUM ANALYZE
> > "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 06:18:34 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 07:34:27 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
> > [2004-05-18 07:43:18 PM] Performing: ANALYZE "public"."search_words4"
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
