Search Postgresql Archives

Re: autovacuum and immediate shutdown issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 10:53 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Brad Nicholson <bnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 12:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> That seems like a fundamentally stupid idea, unless you are unconcerned
> >>> with the time and cost of getting the DB running again, which seemingly
> >>> you are.
> >
> >> I disagree that this is fundamentally stupid.  We are talking about a
> >> situation where the server is about to die, HA solution kicks in and
> >> moves it to standby.
> >
> > Moving it to standby immediately is a good idea, but it does not follow
> > that you need to hit the DB over the head with a hammer.  A fast-mode
> > shutdown seems perfectly adequate.  If it isn't, you're going to need
> > nontrivial recovery effort anyhow.
> 
> All of this is completely besides the point that a database that's
> been shutdown immediately / had the power cord yanked comes back up
> and doesn't start autovacuuming automatically, which seems a
> non-optimal behaviour.

It's also not going to endear us very much to the VLDB crowd - it will
amounts to a multi-hour crash recovery for those folks while analyze
regenerates statistics.

-- 
Brad Nicholson  416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux