On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:37 +0000, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > [...] > >> Suppose the feature request was not a trivial one, but > >> maybe a "DEPENDS ON <object>" clause for "CREATE FUNCTION" > >> to allow PostgreSQL to deny requests to drop a table/view/ > >> function that is needed by a function - where would I pro- > >> pose that? > > > On -hackers, just like any other feature request, trivial or not. > > Thanks. Any particular form? A quick glance at the archives > did not reveal any feature requests that were not accompa- > nied by a patch :-). > There is not a specific format but a good thing to do is: Request Feature Provide Use Case Provide Example syntax (if applicable) Joshua D. Drake > Tim > > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
