Search Postgresql Archives

Re: UPDATE statement with syntax error doesn't raise a warning?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mirko Pace <mirkop82@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've ran an update statement like this (obviously wrong, I know!):

> update my_table
>   set boolean_field = true AND
>   my_notes = 'something'
> where id in
>    (select id from my_table order by random() limit 4000);

> in my psql client and I had a "UPDATE 4000" result but, correctly, anything
> was changed in my_table.

> So... why pg didn't raise a warning about syntax issue?

Because there is no syntax error? "TRUE AND my_notes =
'something'" is a valid expression (and equivalent to
"my_notes = 'something'").

Tim


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux