Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 25 sep 2009, at 02.59, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sam Mason <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
+        if (portnum < 1 || portnum > 65535)

BTW, it strikes me that we could tighten this even more by rejecting
target ports below 1024.  This is guaranteed safe on all Unix systems
I know of, because privileged ports can only be listened to by root- owned
processes and we know the postmaster won't be one.  I am not sure
whether it would be possible to start the postmaster on a low-numbered
port on Windows though.  Anyone know?  Even if it's possible, do we
want to allow it?

Windows doesn't care. A non privileged process can open any port, both above and below 1024.

Other than that, I agree with previous comments - restricting this in libpq won't actually help anything, but in a few limited cases it will be very annoying.

/Magnus



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux