Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [HACKERS] libpq port number handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:
> Sam Mason <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> +		if (portnum < 1 || portnum > 65535)
> 
> BTW, it strikes me that we could tighten this even more by rejecting
> target ports below 1024.  This is guaranteed safe on all Unix systems
> I know of, because privileged ports can only be listened to by root-owned
> processes and we know the postmaster won't be one.

This is just an aside.

The recent Linux system allows to assign a part of root privileges (called
as capabilities) on a certain process.

 Example)
 # setcap cap_net_bind_service=ep /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres
     <-- it allows anyone to launch postmaster with cap_net_bind_service capability.

 $ pg_ctl -o "-i -p 100" start
 $ psql postgres -p 100
 psql (8.5devel)
 Type "help" for help.

 postgres=#

> Even if it's possible, do we want to allow it?

I cannot find any merits.

Thanks,
-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux