Search Postgresql Archives

Re: vacuumdb is failing with NUMBER OF INDEX TUPLES NOT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 12:31:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, I haven't the foggiest idea what sort of corruption might
> allow the index to seem to work (and not, say, crash the reindex itself
> which is going to use that information...) yet allow problems to appear
> much later on.  Too bad the evidence is gone now.

Dunno if this is any help, but on a 7.2 system I saw a REINDEX which
was interrupted leave the index at least partially working.  We ended
up with an index which seemed fine, but which didn't contain certain
rows (so those rows were not visible when the SELECT criterion was
the indexed field).  This was extremely puzzling, but a DROP INDEX;
CREATE INDEX pair solved it.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
		--Roger Brinner

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux