On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 23:43, Bruce Momjian wrote: > David Garamond wrote: > > >>Now suppose /disk1 fails, one of the shadow can be configured to > > >>immediately take over as the master database, without any down time. We > > >>can then add /disk4/dbname.fdb, for instance, to become a new shadow. > > >> > > >>Alternatively, when a shadow fails, IB/Firebird can refuse further > > >>transactions until there is another shadow coming up, so the database is > > >>shadowed all the time. > > > > > > No, we don't have plans to do that. We will allow continuous logging so > > > a tar backup plus this log will bring you up to current. > > > > What about the future synchronous replication or clustering? Will this > > feature do what shadowing in IB/FB does? Cause I've met a couple of > > people that really love this feature and they cling to FB because of this. > > > > Actually, what is needed is: > > > > - an exact mirror at all times; > > - a very simple, straightforward, and fast way to failover; > > > > done by software. > > I recommend they keep clinging. :-) > Should we recommend they submit a patch instead? :-) Seriously though this sounds like it could be an extension of the tablespaces implementation couldn't it? Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)