Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not sure there is any clean solution that would make this do what > you expect, partly because it's not real clear what you expect > (consider nested SECURITY DEFINER functions, error recovery, etc). > I'd be inclined to put a band-aid on it by forbidding SET SESSION > AUTHORIZATION inside functions. Well, we could also try to just not switch back to the old value when exiting the function. I'll have a look to see whether that is doable. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
