we're discussing it on -advocacy, and "some facts wrong" ranks as *the* understatement of the week :) There are more facts wrong on it then there are right :( On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Magnus Naeslund(t) wrote: > Has anyone read this?: > > http://lwn.net/Articles/78285/ > > It seems that it has some facts wrong about postgresql in there, for > example it claims that postgresql doesn't have rowlevel locking, > deadlock detection, or even encryption (i think protocol security here). > > This might be an interesting read, and i think someone from the > marketing lists/group should send them an friendly mail pointing out any > wrong facts, i don't feel too sure about what (more) they might have > gotten wrong. > > Regards > Magnus > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
